Evangelizing post-moderns, Part 1

Published Sunday, April 22, 2007

How do you evangelize people who have no Biblical knowledge?  Furthermore, how do you bring the gospel truths to people who question whether we can really be certain about anything?

Too often I am content to become silent if someone resists the gospel and tells me they are not interested or have some other difficult objection.  Some recent reading, listening and discussion has caused me to consider more carefully how I might persist.  I don't want their excuses to coddle my own excuses for being tight-lipped.

I've been listening to a series by Gary Hendrix of Grace Reformed Baptist Church which discusses some of the barriers to evangelism with the young adults of my generation.  In the next few blog posts, I'll present some of these ideas in a (hopefully) condensed manner.

The first major barrier to evangelism has two parts:  Biblical illiteracy and post-modern epistemology.

More and more young people are Biblically illiterate.  They know next to nothing of what the Bible says, let alone what it means.  With respect to salvation, this is an obvious problem.  God designed salvation not merely to be seen or experienced.  It involves thinking; it involves knowledge.  A person must know who Jesus is so they might put their faith in Him.

More and more people have never attended a Biblical Christian church, and many will not come even if they are invited.  They don't know the Bible, and they are not willing to go to church where they might learn the Bible.

The second part of the barrier is a post-modern epistemology.  I wasn't familiar with the term, but epistemology is the study of knowledge and justified belief.

We assume that truth is knowable, and we assume knowledge can be communicated by words.  A post-modern mindset challenges these ideas.  They question whether truth is really knowable and whether we can be certain about anything.  They claim that you cannot be certain what a person means; you have to experience a thing for yourself.  In schools, the question is no longer, "What do these words mean?" but "What do these words mean to you?"

In this frame of mind, they often reject all dogmatism and all absolutes.  They ask, "What makes you think you have it right, and everyone else has it wrong?"

Even when Bible knowledge is communicated, it is received with a deeply  embedded skepticism--skepticism that we can know what the Bible meant and skepticism of the dogmatism of the Bible.  Even if they half accept Biblical truths, they cannot understand how we would be willing to stake our own lives on it.

permalink | Tags: Filed under: Bible

4 Comments

Well, then there's the argument used from Malcolm Gladwell's book "The Tipping Point" where he gives numerous examples of how mere "knowledge" can often times have no effect on actions.

At the end of one of his many examples, he states "What this study is suggesting, in other words, is that the convictions of your heart and the actual contents of your thoughts are less important, in the end, in guiding your actions than the immediate context of your behavior."

That's when we have to find the "Context" of their lives and figure out where they are, and through understanding that, we can then begin to "build bridges" whtn them. We can find areas of agreement within morals and principles, then hope to share the background knowledge that leads us to our own morals and values. All in hope that they can uderstand the saving grace that is the foundation for all perspectives.

An obvious converse example from the back-slidden pastors who have the knowledge, but failed to bring context to their knowledge, shows that its merely a sad assumption that knowledge is the foundation to build on.

Dave Hunt on 4/22/2007 11:43:22 AM PST

You always give me lots to think about, David. Very good insight. Thus the importance, also, of prayer. 1 Timothy 2:1-4

Love ya.

Gwen Larsen on 4/25/2007 8:05:53 PM PST

Recently, I shared my insights from remaining silent for seven days straight. buy wow goldcheap wow goldbuy wow goldcheap wow goldbuy wow goldcheap wow goldThe silence wasn’t a choice I would have made. world of warcraft goldwow goldworld of warcraft goldwow goldworld of warcraft goldI didn’t go to a monastery and take a vow of silence as some attempt at deeper reflection.world of warcraft goldwow goldworld of warcraft goldWow gold The silence was imposed by Laryngitis. Remaining silent led me to reflect on how marketers go about getting attention.world of warcraft gold wow goldworld of warcraft goldwow gold To get attention without a voice,wow geldwow gold kaufenbuy wow goldwow geldwow powow orwow po

I had tried smiling, but when that didn’t help, I had to resort to waving my hands in an attempt to catch the peripheral vision. And, when that didn’t work,wow gold kaufenbuy wow goldwow geldwow gold kaufenbuy wow goldwow geldwow gold kaufenbuy wow gold

I tried whistling. world of warcraft goldwow goldworld of warcraft goldwow goldNone of which were very successful. Marketers have the same challenge. They smile nicely – nothing. They wave their hands – nothing. They whistle – and thewow orwow powow orwow powow orbuy wow goldcheap wow gold

only reaction from the consumer is annoyance. wow goldworld of warcraft goldwow goldWill we look back at some point in the not too distant future and wonder how quickly the walls between Online and Offline media eroded? wow gold

world of warcraft goldOr will we still be living with these walls between Online and Offline, these vestiges of the dot.com media bubble that artificially divided media?wow goldworld of warcraft gold

nana on 1/10/2008 9:22:37 AM PST

http://www.kitlen.com

a on 4/28/2008 9:27:14 AM PST


Leave a comment*

Name (required, please use your real name)

EMail** (required, but not published)

Protected by FormShield  
Type the characters shown in image for verification
 



* Inappropriate or off-topic comments will be removed
** I will never send you spam or sell your e-mail address to anyone.